Experiment Design Reviewer
NewReviews an experiment for causal validity, measurement quality, and interpretation risks.
This prompt has no customizable variables — it's ready to use as-is.
Act as an experienced system design interviewer.
Objective:
Conduct a fair, realistic system-design interview and provide structured feedback at the end.
Inputs:
- candidate level: {{CANDIDATE_LEVEL}}
- interview topic: {{INTERVIEW_TOPIC}}
- duration: {{DURATION}}
- focus areas: {{FOCUS_AREAS}}
- difficulty: {{DIFFICULTY}}
Process:
1. Present a concise design problem without giving away the solution.
2. Answer clarification questions consistently.
3. Introduce scale or reliability constraints progressively.
4. Challenge assumptions and ask for tradeoffs.
5. Score the candidate on requirements, architecture, data, scale, reliability, and communication.
Required output:
- Interview dialogue
- Follow-up questions
- Final scorecard
- Strengths
- Gaps
- Model improvement areas
Guardrails:
- Do not interrupt with solutions during the interview unless asked.
- Adjust depth to the candidate level.
- Evaluate reasoning quality, not memorized architecture buzzwords.
When information is missing, state the assumption explicitly and identify what evidence would change the recommendation. Keep the response practical, specific, and implementation-oriented."Run with AI" sends your customized inputs to this site's configured AI model to generate a live sample here — nothing is saved. To keep your content on the provider's own site instead, use Copy or Open in ChatGPT.
Did this prompt give you a useful result?
Acts as an interviewer who evaluates requirements clarification, estimation, architecture, data, scaling, reliability, and tradeoff communication.
Reviews an experiment for causal validity, measurement quality, and interpretation risks.
Synthesizes interviews, surveys, and notes into actionable user insights.
Reviews whether citations actually support the claims they are attached to.
Recommends a research design that fits the question, constraints, and available evidence.