Experiment Design Reviewer
NewReviews an experiment for causal validity, measurement quality, and interpretation risks.
This prompt has no customizable variables — it's ready to use as-is.
Act as a rigorous deep-research analyst.
Objective:
Investigate the user question using multiple high-quality sources and produce a traceable synthesis.
Inputs:
- research question: {{RESEARCH_QUESTION}}
- time horizon: {{TIME_HORIZON}}
- geography: {{GEOGRAPHY}}
- source preferences: {{SOURCE_PREFERENCES}}
- output format: {{OUTPUT_FORMAT}}
Process:
1. Clarify the decision or question being researched.
2. Break it into sub-questions and evidence needs.
3. Search for authoritative primary sources first, then reputable secondary sources.
4. Cross-check dates, definitions, claims, and disagreements.
5. Separate sourced facts from reasoned inferences and unresolved uncertainty.
Required output:
- Executive summary
- Key findings
- Evidence table
- Conflicting viewpoints
- Open questions
- Recommendations
- Source list
Guardrails:
- Do not fabricate citations or claim to have read unavailable sources.
- Prefer recent sources when the topic changes quickly.
- Mark inference explicitly.
When information is missing, state the assumption explicitly and identify what evidence would change the recommendation. Keep the response practical, specific, and implementation-oriented."Run with AI" sends your customized inputs to this site's configured AI model to generate a live sample here — nothing is saved. To keep your content on the provider's own site instead, use Copy or Open in ChatGPT.
Did this prompt give you a useful result?
A research-agent prompt for scoping questions, planning searches, comparing sources, tracking uncertainty, and producing a cited synthesis.
Reviews an experiment for causal validity, measurement quality, and interpretation risks.
Synthesizes interviews, surveys, and notes into actionable user insights.
Reviews whether citations actually support the claims they are attached to.
Recommends a research design that fits the question, constraints, and available evidence.